No Spam?

SPAM: Box vs Microsoft vs IBM vs the rest: Leaders, followers, challengers

Sender: TechTarget <inf*@*d-email.techtarget.com> Sent on: 07/31/2017 09:48 PM Subject: Box vs Microsoft vs IBM vs the rest: Leaders, followers, challengers Amount: 2

Message (Plain Version)

 

Enterprise Content Management is a market in transition. And as demand for modernization becomes widespread, long-time leaders are investing in new capabilities to keep up - and bringing more of the market to the cloud to meet the needs of users and IT managers alike.

This report shows how a range of providers measure up to help companies make the right choice when requirements are skewed to the needs of
information workers who need to create, collaborate on, share, and find enterprise content.

Use the 2017 Forrester Wave report to:

Get educated. Gain an understanding of how the ECM market is changing and why complex, on-premises ECM suites are giving way to Cloud Content Management platforms like Box.
Define your needs. Forrester ranks the top 15 ECM business content vendors based on current offerings, strategy and market presence to help you evaluate vendors that suit your needs.
Select a vendor. Learn how cloud content management platforms like Box are designed for usability, ease of adoption and secure management of your content for all aspects of your business.
VIEW NOW

ABOUT THIS EMAIL
This email is published by the TechTarget Business Applications and Architecture Media Group.

Copyright 2017 TechTarget, Inc. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.

To unsubscribe from all TechTarget Business Applications and Architecture Media Group.
Go to unsubscribe.

TechTarget Business Applications and Architecture Media Group, 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA 02466
Contact: webmaster@techtarget.com

When you access content from this newsletter, your information may be shared with the sponsors of that content as described in our Privacy Policy.

Header

Return-Path: HY6QPBJ-IQDDK2-RUHQ3C-2DYLII-WBHEC0-H-M2-2017073****************@*echtarget.bounce.ed10.net
X-Original-To: jun*@*pambog.com
Received: from techtarget.outbound.ed10.com (techtarget.outbound.ed10.com [96.47.30.xxx])
by mx.discard.email (Go MTA) with ESMTP
for jun*@*pambog.com; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Return-Path: HY6QPBJ-IQDDK2-RUHQ3C-2DYLII-WBHEC0-H-M2-2017073****************@*echtarget.bounce.ed10.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=ed-email.techtarget.com; s=ED-DKIM-V3; c=relaxed/relaxed;
q=dns/txt; i=@ed-email.techtarget.com; t=1501530479;
h=From;
bh=J8ZIS5AZmEm8f/ZbFDbe61MsP2g=;
b=W8Wjo8ESv3HxTCQrkIwUJ3+q8WmNg7B/ZZ/pRSBjaedCJyDFZAMNYbrcYtRnCCAw
tk/66xrybn0laGNOzDfWynKZxOT8Fao8KtzTTTYMCFBHjZswIt7BAAEL4rqIeaEI
6w7SJku/SHF3jINYgJlP6AdTUKplG+UFP0jlGFSSfjk=;
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
s=ED2011-02; d=ed-email.techtarget.com;
h=Received:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Message-Id:X-Mail-From:X-Match:X-RCPT-To:X-Mailer;
b=dIdVz8XKmPsge1JQGxKjP6Dnfs3PD7Cjw/gSeeaYYXJZpAj7/jaIL+hQa4sord9F
JGVkFVfx+qTGdYh6OGwqtF6QcdQKSdt5uHELhftBhq3cAfLmSsjB4G2NWilIsj1i
Received: from [127.0.0.xxx] ([127.0.0.xxx:51843])
by bm1-23.bo3.e-dialog.com (envelope-from HY6QPBJ-IQDDK2-RUHQ3C-2DYLII-WBHEC0-H-M2-2017073****************@*echtarget.bounce.ed10.net)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.xxx r(34222M)) with ECSTREAM
id F8/0E-21473-F698F795; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:47:59 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:47:59 -0400
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "TechTarget" inf*@*d-email.techtarget.com
Reply-To: "TechTarget" inf*@*d-email.techtarget.com
To: jun*@*pambog.com
Subject: Box vs Microsoft vs IBM vs the rest:
Leaders, followers, challengers
Message-Id: 17917-510-HY6QPBJ-IQDDK2-RUHQ3C-2DYLII-WBHEC0-H-M2-2017*******************@*-dialog.com
X-Mail-From: HY6QPBJ-IQDDK2-RUHQ3C-2DYLII-WBHEC0-H-M2-2017073****************@*echtarget.bounce.ed10.net
X-Match: techtarget.bounce.ed10.net
X-RCPT-To: jun*@*pambog.com
X-Mailer: EDMAIL R6.00.02